Brian Gongol

Does it make a difference if they're doing it because of religious objections? What if the drivers are Muslims? What if they also want to refuse to carry passengers using seeing-eye dogs? How does that compare to a restaurant refusing service to a customer due to racial discrimination?

It's going to hit Minnesota, too, where forecasters are musing about how it's expected to be the worst one-two punch since 1982. And it's fair to say that weather forecasting is at least a little more sophisticated than it was in 1982.




That's why anarcho-capitalism is a step too far: The rule of law is needed to step in to keep the powerful (in this case, mothers) from violating the human rights of the weak (in this case, the baby) for personal gain

Biggest loss in a decade

In fact, just as efficient as compact fluorescent bulbs, which are hard on the eyes, even if at least one California state legislator wants to make their cousins, the incandescents, illegal. There's just something that feels Stalinist about banning certain types of light bulbs...especially when the private sector (as evidenced by the GE announcement) is able to come up with palatable answers on its own. Who wouldn't buy a super-efficient light bulb, if it were just as good as today's bulbs and used less energy for the money?


Almost as funny: Retirement home uses Nintendo Wii to bring bowling to the people

Study suggests that government influence is being used to pressure scientists to use words like "emergence" and "spread" instead of "evolution" in their research studies
